Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Alignment Mapping Stakeholder Salience Model Architecture Communication Canvas Power Interest Grid

Criterion	Facilitation Alignment Mapping	Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model	Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas	Facilitation Power Interest Grid
Purposedifferent	When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.	When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.	The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design.	When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Medium	Medium	Low
Timedifferent	1-2 h	60-90 min	60-120 min	30-60 min
Participantsdifferent	4-12	3-6	2-8	2-8
Formatdifferent	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop + async	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions	Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class	Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan	Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder
Tags1 shared	AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance	ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning

Add more methods