methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h1-4 h90-180 min15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
4-123-83-62-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action PlanGQM Table, Metric ProfilesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods