methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration of a yellow story card, blue rule cards, green example cards and a red question card on a light workspace.
Agile
Example Mapping
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Purposedifferent
When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h20-40 min initial, dann laufend30-60 min30 min Setup, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
4-123-153-71-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsROAM Board, Owner ListExample Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open QuestionsRAID Log, Status Report Source
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
Add more methods