View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 60-120 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-15 | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | ROAM Board, Owner List | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |