View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Agile Ideal Days |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 15-60 min | 45-90 min | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-9 | 3-12 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | EstimationEffortAgile | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |