methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper illustration of Power-Interest Grid with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Facilitation
Power Interest Grid
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-2 h1-3 h30-60 min1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
4-121-52-81-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsFunnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesPower Interest Grid, Strategy per StakeholderExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods