View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Delivery RAID Log |  Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | RAID Log, Status Report Source | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |