methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Purposedifferent
When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h20-45 min2-4 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-121-83-123-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
Add more methods