methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Purposedifferent
After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min10-20 min daily45–75 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-121Team members involved4-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Lessons learned, Action items, Event summaryDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsSailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
LearningOperationsImprovement
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
Add more methods