methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Purposedifferent
After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
20-45 min15-30 min10-20 min daily1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
3-122-613-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Lessons learned, Action items, Event summaryRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
LearningOperationsImprovement
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Add more methods