methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Purposedifferent
After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
20-45 min15-30 min10-20 min daily45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-122-612-5
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Lessons learned, Action items, Event summaryRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis
Tagsno overlap
LearningOperationsImprovement
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
Add more methods