View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Agile Planning Poker |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 2-4 h | 2-5 min je Item | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-12 | 3-9 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam |