View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Systems Thinking Systems Mapping |  Agile Planning Poker |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 1-3 h | 2-5 min je Item | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-12 | 3-9 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | System Map, Dependencies, Leverage Points | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability |