methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Affinity Estimation.
Agile
Affinity Estimation
Story Splitting method illustration showing its working structure
Agile
Story Splitting
Paper illustration of Cost of Delay with its method-specific working model.
Delivery
Cost of Delay
Paper illustration of ICE Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
ICE Scoring
Purposedifferent
When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes.When a story becomes too large for a clean flow, it breaks scope down along value and risk. It shapes the work into a form that ships earlier and is easier to verify.Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence.When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min30-60 min90-180 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-122-63-82-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear ItemsSmaller Stories, Acceptance Criteria, Split RationaleCoD Table, Prioritization SequenceICE Table, Top Idea List
Tagsno overlap
EstimationBacklogRelative sizing
BacklogIterationDelivery
PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision
PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision
Add more methods