View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Decision Making Risk Matrix |  Growth A/B Testing |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 30-60 min | 1-4 Wochen | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-10 | 1-6 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Risk Matrix, Top Risk List | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | ICE Table, Top Idea List |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision |