View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Operations Process Mapping |  Agile Planning Poker |  Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 1-3 h | 2-5 min je Item | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-10 | 3-9 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | ProcessOperationsImprovement | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | LeanObservationProcessOperations |