View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Agile Planning Poker |  Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 2-5 min je Item | 60-120 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-9 | 4-10 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam |