methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Affinity Estimation.
Agile
Affinity Estimation
Paper illustration of Dual Track Agile with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Dual-Track Agile
Paper illustration of Product Kata with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Product Kata
Story Splitting method illustration showing its working structure
Agile
Story Splitting
Purposedifferent
When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes.When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream.Product Kata helps clarify customer problems, solution ideas, and evidence through a repeatable improvement routine. It captures direction, current metric, target metric, experiment notes, and learning.When a story becomes too large for a clean flow, it breaks scope down along value and risk. It shapes the work into a form that ships earlier and is easier to verify.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-90 minLaufend, Wochen bis Monate1-2 Wochen je Loop30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-124-103-102-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear ItemsDiscovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte StoriesDirection, Current metric, Target metric, Experiment note, Learning reportSmaller Stories, Acceptance Criteria, Split Rationale
Tagsno overlap
EstimationBacklogRelative sizing
AgileDiscoveryDelivery
OutcomesDiscoveryLearningIterationCoaching
BacklogIterationDelivery
Add more methods