View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Agile Planning Poker |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 1-3 h | 2-5 min je Item | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-8 | 3-9 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | SensemakingDecisionRationale | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | RationaleKnowledgeDecision |