methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Affinity Diagramming
UX Research
Affinity Diagramming
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Purposedifferent
When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer.When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLow
Timedifferent
45–90 min3-14 Tage20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
3-1050+Based on research question
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Theme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areasSurvey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsContent groups, Label set, IA hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause
QuantitativeResearchValidation
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Empathy Mapping
UX Research
Empathy Mapping
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration of Outcome-Driven Innovation with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Outcome-Driven Innovation