methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Runbook workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Runbook
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.For recurring operational tasks or incidents, the method keeps solid action logic ready. It reduces uncertainty when time pressure, role changes, or rare situations demand fast access.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min20-60 min1-5 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-31-4NutzertrafficNutzertraffic
Formatsame
AsyncAsyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleRunbook, Checklist, Escalation PathInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
OperationsReliabilityDocumentation
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods