methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Red Teaming method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Red Teaming
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Views and Beyond method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Views and Beyond
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min1-4 h30 min Setup, dann laufend1-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-33-81-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone1-4
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleChallenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation PlanRAID Log, Status Report SourceArchitecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
RiskDecisionSensemaking
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture
Add more methods