methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Red Teaming method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Red Teaming
Views and Beyond method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Views and Beyond
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments.Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min30 min Setup, dann laufend1-4 h1-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-31-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone3-81-4
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleRAID Log, Status Report SourceChallenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation PlanArchitecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
RiskDecisionSensemaking
DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture
Add more methods