methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
15-45 min1-3 h1-4 h30-120 min
Participantsdifferent
1-33-101-52-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleProcess Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component DiagramObservation Notes, Improvement Ideas
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ProcessOperationsImprovement
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
LeanObservationProcessOperations
Add more methods