View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Architecture Decision RecordOption FramingStakeholder Salience ModelDecision Framing Workshop
| Criterion |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Decision Making Option Framing |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 45-120 min | 60-90 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 | 3-8 | 3-6 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions |