methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
15-45 min30-60 min1-3 h20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
1-33-103-103-12
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleEmotion Board, Themes, Action ItemsLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement ActionsLessons learned, Action items, Event summary
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
LearningOperationsImprovement
Add more methods