methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Incident Command workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Incident Command
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.During an acute incident with several people involved, the method creates a clear leadership and communication structure. It reduces chaos when fast coordination and clean situational awareness are both needed at once.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighMediumLow
Timedifferent
15-45 minHalber TagAs needed1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-35-204-151-4
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleSimulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksIncident Log, Action Tracker, Stakeholder UpdatesArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ResilienceOperationsIncident
IncidentOperationsReliability
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
Add more methods