View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Growth A/B Testing |  Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 1-3 h | 1-4 Wochen | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 | 1-5 | 1-6 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |