methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Eat the Frog
Operations
Eat the Frog
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min15-90 min daily15-30 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
1-312-63-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationalePriority Task, Completion Note, Daily FocusRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Add more methods