View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Innovation Design Charrette | ![]() Architecture arc42 | ![]() Innovation Starbursting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 1-2 Tage | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 | 10-50 | 1-4 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery |



