methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A paper-based illustration representing Customer Journey Canvas with its core stages and visible working result.
UX Design
Customer Journey Canvas
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Architecture Inception Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Inception Canvas
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When a journey needs to be understood across several phases, it arranges experience, touchpoints, and opportunities into one picture. It makes gaps and friction along the user path clear.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
15-45 min1-3 h1-3 h1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
1-33-105-303-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleCustomer Journey Canvas, Pain Points, Experience OpportunitiesConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasInception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
JourneyCustomerService designCanvas
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
AlignmentArchitectureCanvas
Add more methods