View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Architecture Decision RecordCurrent Reality Tree5 WhysTheory of Constraints Thinking Process
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree | ![]() Operations 5 Whys | ![]() Systems Thinking Theory of Constraints Thinking Process |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. | The Theory of Constraints Thinking Process exposes a system's bottleneck and the logic behind it. It suits situations where many symptoms trace back to the same limiting relationship. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 2-6 h | 15-30 min | 0.5-3 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | Root cause notes, Countermeasures | Current Reality Logic, Conflict Cloud, Future Reality Tree, Implementation Obstacles |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving | Theory of ConstraintsConstraintsSystems thinkingCausality |



