methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Causal Factor Analysis.
Operations
Causal Factor Analysis
Paper illustration for Incident Timeline Analysis.
DevOps
Incident Timeline Analysis
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.For an event with a complicated course, the method breaks down the contributing factors along the timeline. It shows how conditions, decisions, and reactions together produce a course of events.For an incident with an unclear sequence, the method makes the timeline precisely visible. It separates perception, reaction, and delay so cause and effect become more clearly readable.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighMediumLow
Timedifferent
15-45 min2-6 h60-180 min15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
1-33-103-102-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleEvent Timeline, Causal Factor Chart, Cause List, Corrective ActionsIncident Timeline, Evidence Log, Delay Analysis, Improvement ActionsRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
CausalityIncidentRoot causeTimeline
IncidentTimelineSite Reliability Engineering
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods