View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Architecture Decision RecordBalanced ScorecardArchitecture Communication CanvasAlignment Mapping
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Business Strategy Balanced Scorecard | ![]() Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | Halber Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 60-120 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 | 4-12 | 2-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative Map | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | StrategyMetricsExecution | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |



