methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Incident Command workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Incident Command
Runbook workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Runbook
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.During an acute incident with several people involved, the method creates a clear leadership and communication structure. It reduces chaos when fast coordination and clean situational awareness are both needed at once.For recurring operational tasks or incidents, the method keeps solid action logic ready. It reduces uncertainty when time pressure, role changes, or rare situations demand fast access.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
15-45 min1-2 TageAs needed20-60 min
Participantsdifferent
1-31-44-151-4
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewIncident Log, Action Tracker, Stakeholder UpdatesRunbook, Checklist, Escalation Path
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
IncidentOperationsReliability
OperationsReliabilityDocumentation
Add more methods