methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
15-45 min1-4 Wochen30 min Setup, dann laufend1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-31-61-3 maintaining, briefing for everyoneNutzertraffic
Formatsame
AsyncAsyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryRAID Log, Status Report SourceInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods