methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Views and Beyond method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Views and Beyond
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
15-45 min45-90 min1-3 Tage30-120 min
Participantsdifferent
1-32-51-42-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisArchitecture Views, Cross-view Notes, RationaleObservation Notes, Improvement Ideas
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture
LeanObservationProcessOperations
Add more methods