methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Incident Command workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Incident Command
Runbook workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Runbook
Purposedifferent
An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.During an acute incident with several people involved, the method creates a clear leadership and communication structure. It reduces chaos when fast coordination and clean situational awareness are both needed at once.For recurring operational tasks or incidents, the method keeps solid action logic ready. It reduces uncertainty when time pressure, role changes, or rare situations demand fast access.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
15-45 min15-30 minAs needed20-60 min
Participantsdifferent
1-32-64-151-4
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
ADR File, Decision Log, RationaleRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresIncident Log, Action Tracker, Stakeholder UpdatesRunbook, Checklist, Escalation Path
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
IncidentOperationsReliability
OperationsReliabilityDocumentation
Add more methods