methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Purposedifferent
With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min10-20 min je Frage45-90 min45–75 min
Participantsdifferent
1-86-508-80Team members involved
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesConcept Questions, Vote Results, Learning NotesDiscussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
LearningDialogueFacilitation
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
Add more methods