methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Purposedifferent
With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min30-60 min1-2 h45–75 min
Participantsdifferent
1-83-104-12Team members involved
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesEmotion Board, Themes, Action ItemsAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
Add more methods