methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Purposedifferent
With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min1-3 h45-90 min45–75 min
Participantsdifferent
1-83-104-12Team members involved
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement ActionsStarfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
Add more methods