methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Paper session grid with two time blocks, three rooms, colored session cards and an open topic pool.
Facilitation
Barcamp
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Purposedifferent
With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min45-90 minHalber Tag bis 2 Tage45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
1-83-1015-2003-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsSession Board, Session Notes, Community LearningsResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions
Tagsno overlap
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
AutonomyRolesTeam
FacilitationLarge groupLearning
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Add more methods