methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Decision Framing Workshop.
Decision Making
Decision Framing Workshop
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration for Option Framing.
Decision Making
Option Framing
Purposedifferent
With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
20-45 min60-120 min45-90 min45-120 min
Participantsdifferent
1-84-103-123-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesDecision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence PlanExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsOption Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs
Tagsno overlap
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison
Add more methods