View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Accountability Ladder |  Architecture C4 Model |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-45 min | 1-4 h | 45-90 min | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 1-5 | 3-10 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |