methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Purposedifferent
With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min1-2 Tage45-90 minHalf day initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
1-81-43-12Ein Team plus Stakeholder
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsTeam API Document
Tagsno overlap
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
Add more methods