View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Agile Specification by Example |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |  Agile Three Amigos |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min pro Story | 60-90 min pro Feature | 1-3 h | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-6 | 2-8 | 3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement |