View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Agile ROAM Board |  Agile Three Amigos |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min pro Story | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 15-30 min | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-15 | 3 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | ROAM Board, Owner List | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause |