View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Acceptance Criteria WorkshopROAM BoardFailure Mode and Effects AnalysisSpecification by Example
| Criterion |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Agile ROAM Board |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min pro Story | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 2-6 h | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-15 | 3-10 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | ROAM Board, Owner List | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |