View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Agile Example Mapping |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Agile Three Amigos |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min pro Story | 30-60 min | 15-45 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-7 | 1-10 | 3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement |