View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations ABC Analysis |  UX Research Usability Testing |  Product Discovery Wizard of Oz Test |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down. | When a new experience would still be too expensive to automate for real, it simulates the outcome behind the scenes. It checks user reaction and value before the technology disappears. | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-2 h je Session | 2-10 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | Based on research question | 5-20 Nutzer | 5-10 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Usability Issues, Severity List, Recommendations | Prototype Learnings, Manual Effort Notes, Risk List | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | ValidationUXPrototype | PrototypeValidationMVP | ValidationInterviewsPrototype |